DOES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS LEAD TO A SUSTAINABLE WORLD? CORE CONCEPTS AND CROSS CUTTING ISSUES
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals, barriers and opportunities, implementing SDGs, wartime
Abstract
The challenges associated with implementing SDGs at the state level require a thoughtful consideration of contemporary economic theories, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovative approaches such as the Landscape Approach. Understanding the influence of neoliberal economic agendas, refining implementation frameworks, and embracing dynamic, adaptive strategies will be essential for navigating the complex landscape of sustainable development. The challenges in implementing Sustainable Development Goals are intricate and diverse, ranging from political and bureaucratic hurdles to financial and social complexities. Collaborative efforts, transparency, and transformative changes are essential to overcome these challenges and make meaningful progress toward achieving sustainability objectives. Additionally, in the context of the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, the barriers and opportunities are highlighted across various dimensions, encompassing economic, environmental, and geopolitical aspects.
References
1. Arico, S. (2014). The contribution of the sciences, technology and innovation to sustainable development: the application of sustainability science from the perspective of UNESCO's experience. Sustain. Sci. 9, 453e462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0256-6
2. Kumi, E., Arhin, A.A., Yeboah, T. (2014). Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development neoliberalism nexus in developing countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 16, 539e554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9492-7
3. Persson, Å., Weitz, N., Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow-up and review of the sustainable development goals: alignment vs. Internalization. Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law 25, 59e68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12150
4. Reed J, Deakin L, Sunderland T (2015). What are “Integrated Landscape Approaches” and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics : a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 4, 1–7.
5. Reed, J., Van Vianen, J., Deakin, E.L., Barlow, J., Sunderland, T. (2016). Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13284n/aen/a
6. Sayer J., Sunderland T., Ghazoul Jet al. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8349–8356.
7. Sayer J., Margules C., Boedhihartono A.K., Dale A., Sunderland T., Supriatna J., Saryanthi R. (2014) Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science, 10, 345–355.
8. Koehler, G. (2016). Tapping the Sustainable Development Goals for progressive gender equity and equality policy? Gend. Dev. 24, 53e68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1142217
9. Van Vuuren, D.P., Kok, M., Lucas, P.L., Prins, A.G., Alkemade, R., van den Berg, M., Bouwman, L., van der Esch, S., Jeuken, M., Kram, T., Stehfest, E. (2014). Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change.
10. Mboumboue, E., Njomo, D. (2016). Potential contribution of renewables to the improvement of living conditions of poor rural households in developing countries: Cameroon's case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 61, 266e279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.003
11. Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., Unterhalter, E., Dasandi, N., Hudson, D., Kock, R., Mayhew, S., Marx, C., Poole, N. (2015). Governing the UN sustainable development goals: interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. Lancet Glob. Health 3, e251ee252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15) 70112-9
12. Jasovský, D., Littmann, J., Zorzet, A., Cars, O. (2016). Antimicrobial resistanceda threat to the world's sustainable development. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 121, 159e164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2016.1195900
13. Frey, D.F., MacNaughton, G. (2016). A human rights lens on full employment and decent work in the 2030 sustainable development agenda. J. Work. Rights 6, 755e829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016649580
14. Shan, J., Khan, M. (2016). Implications of reverse innovation for socio-economic sustainability: a case study of Philips China. Sustainability 8, 530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060530
15. Flores Baquero, O., Jimenez Fdez de Palencia, A., Perez Foguet, A. (2015). Measuring disparities in access to water based on the normative content of the human right. Soc. Indicat. Res. 2, 741e759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0976-8
16. Giupponi, C., Gain, A.K. (2016). Integrated spatial assessment of the water, energy and food dimensions of the Sustainable Development Goals. Reg. Environ. Change. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0998-z
17. Urmee, T., Md, A. (2016). Social, cultural and political dimensions of off-grid renewable energy programs in developing countries. Renew. Energy 93, 159e167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.040
18. Barnett, C., Parnell, S. (2016). Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environ. Urbanization 28, 87e98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815621473
19. Lytvyn, O., Onyshchenko, A., & Ostapenko, O. (2023). Economic challenges of sustainable development goals in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 100-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-1-100-112
20. Shevchuk O. et al. (2023). Towards a sustainable future: overcoming the challenges of post-war ecosystem reconstruction in Ukraine IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1269 012018.
21. Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunović, I., & Barceló, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Environment, 837, 155865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865
22. Chishti, M. Z., Khalid, A. A., & Sana, M. (2023). Conflict vs sustainability of global energy, agricultural and metal markets: A lesson from Ukraine-Russia war. Resources Policy, 84, 103775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103775
2. Kumi, E., Arhin, A.A., Yeboah, T. (2014). Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development neoliberalism nexus in developing countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 16, 539e554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9492-7
3. Persson, Å., Weitz, N., Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow-up and review of the sustainable development goals: alignment vs. Internalization. Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law 25, 59e68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12150
4. Reed J, Deakin L, Sunderland T (2015). What are “Integrated Landscape Approaches” and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics : a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 4, 1–7.
5. Reed, J., Van Vianen, J., Deakin, E.L., Barlow, J., Sunderland, T. (2016). Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13284n/aen/a
6. Sayer J., Sunderland T., Ghazoul Jet al. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8349–8356.
7. Sayer J., Margules C., Boedhihartono A.K., Dale A., Sunderland T., Supriatna J., Saryanthi R. (2014) Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science, 10, 345–355.
8. Koehler, G. (2016). Tapping the Sustainable Development Goals for progressive gender equity and equality policy? Gend. Dev. 24, 53e68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1142217
9. Van Vuuren, D.P., Kok, M., Lucas, P.L., Prins, A.G., Alkemade, R., van den Berg, M., Bouwman, L., van der Esch, S., Jeuken, M., Kram, T., Stehfest, E. (2014). Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change.
10. Mboumboue, E., Njomo, D. (2016). Potential contribution of renewables to the improvement of living conditions of poor rural households in developing countries: Cameroon's case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 61, 266e279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.003
11. Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., Unterhalter, E., Dasandi, N., Hudson, D., Kock, R., Mayhew, S., Marx, C., Poole, N. (2015). Governing the UN sustainable development goals: interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. Lancet Glob. Health 3, e251ee252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15) 70112-9
12. Jasovský, D., Littmann, J., Zorzet, A., Cars, O. (2016). Antimicrobial resistanceda threat to the world's sustainable development. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 121, 159e164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2016.1195900
13. Frey, D.F., MacNaughton, G. (2016). A human rights lens on full employment and decent work in the 2030 sustainable development agenda. J. Work. Rights 6, 755e829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016649580
14. Shan, J., Khan, M. (2016). Implications of reverse innovation for socio-economic sustainability: a case study of Philips China. Sustainability 8, 530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060530
15. Flores Baquero, O., Jimenez Fdez de Palencia, A., Perez Foguet, A. (2015). Measuring disparities in access to water based on the normative content of the human right. Soc. Indicat. Res. 2, 741e759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0976-8
16. Giupponi, C., Gain, A.K. (2016). Integrated spatial assessment of the water, energy and food dimensions of the Sustainable Development Goals. Reg. Environ. Change. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0998-z
17. Urmee, T., Md, A. (2016). Social, cultural and political dimensions of off-grid renewable energy programs in developing countries. Renew. Energy 93, 159e167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.040
18. Barnett, C., Parnell, S. (2016). Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environ. Urbanization 28, 87e98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815621473
19. Lytvyn, O., Onyshchenko, A., & Ostapenko, O. (2023). Economic challenges of sustainable development goals in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 100-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-1-100-112
20. Shevchuk O. et al. (2023). Towards a sustainable future: overcoming the challenges of post-war ecosystem reconstruction in Ukraine IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1269 012018.
21. Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunović, I., & Barceló, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Environment, 837, 155865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865
22. Chishti, M. Z., Khalid, A. A., & Sana, M. (2023). Conflict vs sustainability of global energy, agricultural and metal markets: A lesson from Ukraine-Russia war. Resources Policy, 84, 103775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103775
Article views: 61
PDF Downloads: 67
Published
2023-12-26
How to Cite
Kuzina, R. (2023). DOES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS LEAD TO A SUSTAINABLE WORLD? CORE CONCEPTS AND CROSS CUTTING ISSUES. Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, (4 (102), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.32782/mer.2023.102.12
Section
MACROECONOMIC MECHANISMS
