FORMATION OF THE DOMESTIC DUAL STUDIES PATTERN AND SUPERPOSITION OF STAKEHOLDERS – THE CASE OF UKRAINE
Abstract
The article investigates the results of stakeholder analysis applied in the course of design and implementation of a national-level project aimed at Ukrainian dual studies management (DSM) system formation. The concept of dual studies (DS) was introduced and promoted in Ukraine thanks to a launched in 2013 project conducted by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Office in Ukraine (FES-Ukraine) in cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (MES), Ukrainian Marketing Association, a wide range of higher educational establishments (HEEs), employers, their associations and other interested parties. Being a complex project, it required deliberate approach to stakeholder analysis and classification that allowed shaping well-targeted strategies aimed at ensuring the required scope of stakeholders’ engagement. The authors applied the Mendelow’s Matrix of stakeholder classification; offered classification of stakeholders according to the DSM levels (macro or state level; meso or regional and sectoral level; and micro level or the level of HEE-company cooperation); and, in addition, in 2013 (launch of the project) and 2019 (launch of the national experiment of DSM introduction as a result of project activities) the authors conducted superposition of stakeholders in the “impact – engagement” system of coordinates. This approach demonstrated expected vs. caused impact of stakeholders on DSM introduction and their expected/real engagement into DSM system functioning in Ukraine. A superposition interference as of 2013 and 2019 demonstrated differences in the list and functions of stakeholders engaged into Ukrainian DSM system on the initial and current stages of its development. This allowed confirming the hypothesis concerning the impossibility of German DSM management system “import” without its adaptation to the national context.
References
Aaltonen, K. & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26 (4), 381–397.
Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2000). Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning 44 (2011), 179–196. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222804628_Strategic_Management_of_Stakeholders_Theory_and_Practice/link/56fe476908ae1408e15cfc05/download
Babiuch, W. & Farha, B. (1994). Stakeholder Analysis Methodologies Resource Book. Retrieved from https://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/5857.pdf
Bakhshi, H., Downing, J., Osborne, M. & Schneider, P. (2017). The Future of Skills: Employment in 2030. London: Pearson and Nesta. Retrieved from https://futureskills.pearson.com/research/assets/pdfs/technical-report.pdf
Balane, M., Palafox, B., Palileo-Villanueva, L., et al. Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Global Health2020. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002661
Beringer, C., Jonas, D. & Gemunden, H. G. (2012). Establishing Project Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Internal Stakeholders' Interactions. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 16–32.
BiBB. Dual course of study. Retrieved from https://www.bibb.de/en/702.php.
Breen, H. (2001). Cooperative education partnerships: an examination of reciprocal relationships between universities and tourism and hospitality industry organisations in providing professional development education for their employees [Southern Cross University]. Retrieved from https://researchportal.scu.edu.au/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991012822014902368/61SCU_INST:ResearchRepository
Brugha, R. & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). How to do (or not do). A stakeholder analysis. Oxford Univ Press. 15. 338–45. Retrieved from http://dess.fmp.ueh.edu.ht/pdf/Zsuzsa_Varvasovsky_2000_stakeholder_analysis.pdf
Brugha, R. & Varvasovszky Z. (2020). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning; 15(3). 239–246. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12312104_Stakeholder_Analysis_A_Review/link/0fcfd50bc8a7f05641000000/download
Buchynska, O., Davlikanova, O., Lylyk, I. & Chaikovska, А. (2020). Analytical report “Employers’ Opinion on Dual Studies” on the results of employers’ awareness about dual studies and experience of participation in the experiment on its introduction in pre-tertiary and tertiary educational establishments. Friedrich Ebert Foundation Office in Ukraine, 100 p. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/rizne/2020/11/10/Dualna_2_2%20edit%206-11.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Buchynska, O., Davlikanova, O., Lylyk, I. & Chaikovska, А. (2020). Analytical report «Students’ Opinion on Dual Studies» on the results of students’ awareness about dual studies and experience of participation in the experiment on its introduction in pre-tertiary and tertiary educational establishments. Friedrich Ebert Foundation Office in Ukraine, 110 p. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ukraine/17747.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2018). Concept of Specialists’ Training under the Dual Form of EducationStudies. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/660-2018-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
Clarkson MBE. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management. Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Crosby, B. (1992). Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic man-agers. Washington DC: USAID.
Davlikanova O. & Hofstetter, H. (2020). The «duales studium» adaptation as an innovation in ukrainian tertiary education: management aspects and results. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 208–221. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-15
Del Carpio, X., Kupets, O., Muller, N., & Olefir, A. (2017). Skills for a modern Ukraine. The World Bank.
European Commission. (2016). 2016 European Semester: Country Reports and Communication. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2016-european-semester-country-reports_en
Floricel, S., Michela, J. L. & Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management.
Francis, M. (1975). "Urban Impact Assessment and Community Involvement: The Case of the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library." Environment and Behavior, 7(3), 373–404.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E. & McVea, J., (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In: Hitt, M., Harrison, J., Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Graf, L., Powell, J., Fortwengel, J. & Bernhard, N. (2014). Duale Studiengänge im globalen Kontext: Internationalisierung in Deutschland und Transfer nach Brasilien, Frankreich, Katar, Mexiko und in die USA – DAAD. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271842872_Dual_Study_Programmes_in_Global_Context_Internationalisation_in_Germany_and_Transfer_to_Brazil_France_Qatar_Mexico_and_the_US_Duale_Studiengange_im_globalen_Kontext_Internationalisierung_in_Deutschlan
Grimble, R. & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 55, 175–186
Heller, C. (2010). Duale Studiengänge. Entwicklung, Stand und Bewertung aus Sicht der beteiligten Akteure. In: Wirtschaft und Berufserziehung, Jg. 62, S. 20–25.
Ishchenko, T., Davlikanova, O. & Chaikovska, A. (2020). Analytical report on the results of the first year experiment on the dual studies introduction in pre-tertiary and tertiary educational establishments. Friedrich Ebert Foundation Office in Ukraine, 96 p. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/zaluchennya-biznes-partneriv-pidvishchennya-yakosti-pidgotovkifahivciv-rannya-adaptaciya-pershi-rezultati-vprovadzhennya-dualnoyi-formi-u-vishchij-osviti [in Ukrainian].
Jeston, J. & Nelis, J. (2008). Business Project Management, Butterworth-Heinemann. pgs, 271–276.
Leventon, J., Fleskens, L. et al (2016). An applied methodology for stakeholder identificationin transdisciplinary research. Sustain Sci, 11, 763–775. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0385-1
Milosevic, D. (2003). Project Management ToolBox: Tools and Techniques for the Practicing Project Manager , John Wiley & Sons, p. 77.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q. & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446– 457.
Montgomery, J. (1974). Technology and civic life: making and implementing development decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nutt, P. (2002). Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps That Lead to Debacles, Berrett-Koehler, pgs. 113–114.
Ommen, N. O., Blut, M., Backhaus, C. & Woisetschlager, D. M. (2016). Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2409–2416. 34. PMI. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (Vol. 4th). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Pogrzeba, A., Townsend, R. & Pop, C. (2016). A comparative study of cooperative education and work-integrated learning in Germany, South Africa, and Namibia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(3), 249–263. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1120050.pdf
Schmeer, K. (2000). Stakeholder analysis guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf
Stakeholder matrix – key matrices for stakeholder analysis. Retrieved from https://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-matrix.html
The Law of Ukraine "On Education" № 2745-VIII as of 06.06.2019. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19. [in Ukrainian].
The Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education" № 392-IX as of 18.12.2019. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18. [in Ukrainian].
Turner, J. R. (2009). The handbook of project-based management: leading strategic change in organizations: McGraw-hill.
What Is Mendelow’s Matrix And How Is It Useful? Retrieved from https://blog.oxfordcollegeofmarketing.com/2018/04/23/what-is-mendelows-matrix-and-how-is-ituseful/
Wolf, C. P. (1988). Social Impact Assessment: The Main Pattern. Social Impact Assessment 12(3–4), 20–21.
WWF (2005). Cross-Cutting Tool Stakeholder Analysis Retrieved from https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/1_1_stakeholder_analysis_11_01_05.pdf
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J. A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2010. No 26(4). P. 381–397.
Ackermann, F., Eden C. Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning. 2000. No 44(2011). P. 179–196. URL : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222804628_Strategic_Management_of_Stakeholders_Theory_and_Practice/link/56fe476908ae1408e15cfc05/download
Babiuch W., Farha B. Stakeholder Analysis Methodologies Resource Book, 1994. URL : https://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/5857.pdf
Bakhshi, H., Downing, J., Osborne, M. and Schneider, P. The Future of Skills: Employment in 2030. London : Pearson and Nesta, 2017. URL : https://futureskills.pearson.com/research/assets/pdfs/technical-report.pdf
Balane, M., Palafox, B., Palileo-Villanueva, L., et al. Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Global Health, 2020. DOI :10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002661 6. Beringer, C., Jonas, D., and Gemunden, H. G. Establishing Project Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Internal Stakeholders' Interactions. Project Management Journal. 2012. No 43(6). P. 16–32.
BiBB. Dual course of study. Retrieved from https://www.bibb.de/en/702.php.
Breen, H. Cooperative education partnerships: an examination of reciprocal relationships between universities and tourism and hospitality industry organizations in providing professional development education for their employees [Southern Cross University], 2001. URL : https://researchportal.scu.edu.au/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991012822014902368/61SCU_INST:ResearchRepository
Brugha R., Varvasovszky, Z. How to do (or not do). A stakeholder analysis. Oxford Univ Press, 2000. 15. 338–45. URL : http://dess.fmp.ueh.edu.ht/pdf/Zsuzsa_Varvasovsky_2000_stakeholder_analysis.pdf
Brugha, R., Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning. 2020. No 15(3). P. 239–246. URL : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12312104_Stakeholder_Analysis_A_Review/link/0fcfd50bc8a7f05641000000/download
Бучинська А., Давліканова О., Лилик І., Чайковська А. Аналітичний звіт «Думки роботодавців про дуальну освіту» за результатами дослідження обізнаності роботодавців про дуальну форму здобуття освіти та досвіду участі у пілотному проєкті із її запровадження на рівні фахової передвищої та вищої освіти України. Представництво Фонду ім.Фрідріха Еберта в Україні, 2020. 100 с. URL : https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/rizne/2020/11/10/Dualna_2_2%20edit%206-11.pdf
Бучинська О., Давліканова О., Лилик І., Чайковська А. Аналітичний звіт «Думки здобувачів про дуальну освіту» за результатами дослідження обізнаності роботодавців про дуальну форму здобуття освіти та досвіду участі у пілотному проєкті із її запровадження на рівні фахової передвищої та вищої освіти України. Представництво Фонду ім.Фрідріха Еберта в Україні, 2020. 110 с. URL: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ukraine/17747.pdf
Концепція підготовки фахівців за дуальною формою здобуття освіти, розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України від 19 верес. 2018 р. № 660-р. URL : https://mon.gov.ua/storage/kontseptsiidualnoi-osviti.doc
Clarkson MBE. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management. Review. 1995. No 20(1). P. 92–117.
Crosby, B. Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic man-agers. Washington DC: USAID, 1992.
Davlikanova O., Hofstetter, H. The «Duales Studium» Adaptation as an Innovation In Ukrainian Tertiary Education: Management Aspects and Results. Marketing and Management of Innovations (Web of Science). 2020. No 3. P. 208–221. URL : https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-15
Del Carpio, X., Kupets, O., Muller, N., & Olefir, A. Skills for a modern Ukraine. The World Bank, 2017. [Google Scholar]
European Commission. 2016 European Semester: Country Reports and Communication, 2016. URL : https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2016-european-semester-country-reports_en
Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., and Piperca, S. Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 2016.
Francis, M. "Urban Impact Assessment and Community Involvement: The Case of the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library." Environment and Behavior. 1975. No 7(3). P. 373–404.
Freeman, R. E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Freeman, R. E., McVea, J., A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In: Hitt, M., Harrison, J., Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2001. pp. 189e207,204
Graf, L., Powell, J., Fortwengel, J., Bernhard, N. Duale Studiengänge im globalen Kontext: Internationalisierung in Deutschland und Transfer nach Brasilien, Frankreich, Katar, Mexiko und in die USA – DAAD, 2014. URL : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271842872_Dual_Study_Programmes_in_Global_Context_Internationalisation_in_Germany_and_Transfer_to_Brazil_France_Qatar_Mexico_and_the_US_Duale_Studiengange_im_globalen_Kontext_Internationalisierung_in_Deutschlan
Grimble, R., Wellard, K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 1997. No 55. P. 175–186
Heller, C. Duale Studiengänge. Entwicklung, Stand und Bewertung aus Sicht der beteiligten Akteure. In: Wirtschaft und Berufserziehung, Jg. 2010. No. 62. P. 20–25.
Іщенко Т., Давліканова О., Чайковська А. Аналітичний звіт за результатами першого року проведення експерименту із запровадження пілотного проєкту у закладах фахової передвищої та вищої освіти з підготовки фахівців за дуальною формою здобуття освіти. Представництво Фонду ім. Фрідріха Еберта в Україні, 2020. 96 с. URL : https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/zaluchennya-biznes-partneriv-pidvishchennya-yakosti-pidgotovkifahivciv-rannya-adaptaciya-pershi-rezultati-vprovadzhennya-dualnoyi-formi-u-vishchij-osviti
Jeston, J., Nelis, J. Business Project Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008. P. 271–276.
Leventon, J., Fleskens, L. et al. An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research / Sustain Sci. 2016. No 11. P. 763–775. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0385-1
Milosevic, D. Project Management ToolBox: Tools and Techniques for the Practicing Project Manager, John Wiley & Sons, 2003. p. 77.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, J. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management. 2015. No 33(2). P. 446– 457.
Montgomery, J. Technology and civic life: making and implementing development decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
Nutt, P. Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps That Lead to Debacles, BerrettKoehler, 2002. p. 113–114.
Ommen, N. O., Blut, M., Backhaus, C., and Woisetschlager, D. M. Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success. Journal of Business Research. 2016. No 69(7). P. 2409–2416.
PMI. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (Vol. 4th). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute, Inc., 2008.
Pogrzeba, A., Townsend, R., Pop, C. A comparative study of cooperative education and workintegrated learning in Germany, South Africa, and Namibia. (Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2016. No 17(3). P. 249–263. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1120050.pdf
Schmeer, K. Stakeholder analysis guidelines. 2000. URL : https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf
Stakeholder matrix – key matrices for stakeholder analysis. URL: https://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-matrix.html
Закон України «Про освіту» № 2745-VIII від 06.06.2019 URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19.
Закон України «Про вищу освіту» № 392-IX від 18.12. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18.
Turner, J. R. The handbook of project-based management: leading strategic change in organizations. McGraw-hill, 2009.
What Is Mendelow’s Matrix And How Is It Useful? URL : https://blog.oxfordcollegeofmarketing.com/2018/04/23/what-is-mendelows-matrix-and-how-is-ituseful/
Wolf, C. P. Social Impact Assessment: The Main Pattern. Social Impact Assessment. 1988. 12(3-4): 20-2.
WWF Cross-Cutting Tool Stakeholder Analysis, 2005. URL : https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/1_1_stakeholder_analysis_11_01_05.pdf