METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF THE AGRICULTURE COMPETITIVENESS ASSESSING

  • Olha Khodakivska National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”
  • Nataliia Patyka National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”
  • Audrius Gargasas Vytautas Magnus University
Keywords: competitiveness, criteria, evaluation method, indicator, agriculture

Abstract

In the article the methodological basis of assessing competitiveness are substantiated, their content is defined, the types are systematized, which made it possible to determine the methodological approaches to developing tools for assessing the level of Ukraine’s agriculture competitiveness in the context of international economic integration. It has been established that the assessment of economic systems competitiveness of different levels (country, region, region, enterprise, product) has much in common – the same analysis methods, similar research algorithms, related indicators are used. This is especially characteristic for studies of the industry competitiveness, since the industry market positions are, on the one hand, market positions of the aggregate of its economic entities or manufactured goods, and on the other hand, positions that form the countries and regions competitiveness. It has been proved that the methodological basis for assessing the agriculture competitiveness as an industry of the national economy involves two aspects: firstly, competitiveness is a comparative characteristic of a subject entering the market, therefore it can be assessed only in comparison with other similar subjects or taking into account their market positions; secondly, the assessment on different markets may coincide with the methods used, but it should differ in the indicators, criteria, assessment indicators, which are used, with the possibility of mixing, the partial interchangeability and complementarity of these groups. Criteria for assessing the agriculture competitiveness in the context of international economic integration, which are generally accepted in world practice, are systematized, and which should be considered in three dimensions: the macro level, the meso-level, and the indicators of foreign economic activity. An algorithm for assessing the agriculture competitiveness is proposed.

References

Averikhina, T. V. (2016). Analiz tendentsii vplyvu ekolohichnoho chynnyka na formuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti ekonomichnykh system makro-, mezo- ta mikrorivnei [Analysis of trends in ecology factor influencing the macro, meso and microlevels’ systems competitiveness formation]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 4, 353–364.

Biliak, N. I. (2012). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti silskoho hospodarstva Lvivskoi oblasti [Estimation of competitiveness of Lviv region agriculture]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii im. Gzhytskoho, 1(1), 59–65.

Bondarenko, S. M. & Nevmerzhytska, A. A. (2014). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [Evaluation competitiveness of enterprise]. Tekhnolohii ta dyzain, 2(11). Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/td_2014_2_15.

Burdeniuk, T. H. (2016). Kryterii y pokaznyky konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv ta metodyka yikh yakisnoho analizu [Criteria and indicators of competitiveness of enterprises and methods qualitative analysis]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, 12(2), 143–148.

Horiachuk, V. F. (2011). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti rehioniv Ukrainy na osnovi rezultatnoho pidkhodu [Regional Competitiveness Estimation in Ukraine on the Basis of Resultative Approach]. Rehionalna ekonomika, 1, 39–46.

Zhukovskyi, M. O. (2014). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti potentsialu silskohospodarskoho pidpryiemstva [Assessment of the competitiveness of the agricultural enterprise potential]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Ser. Ekonomika, ahrarnyi menedzhment, biznes, 200(1), 126–130.

Zhurylo, R. M. (2009). Porivnialna kharakterystyka isnuiuchykh metodiv do otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [Comparative characteristics of existing methods to assess the enterprise competitiveness]. Ekonomika i rehion, 4, 124–130.

Zakrevska, L. M. (2017). Otsinka rivnia konkurentospromozhnosti produktsii pidpryiemstv molochnoi promyslovosti z urakhuvanniam yikh potentsiinoi spromozhnosti [Estimation of the level of competitiveness of dairy industry enterprises taking into account their potential capacity]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, 9, 59–64.

Kobyliatskyi, L. S. (2003). Upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu: navch. posib. [Competitiveness Management: training manual]. Kyiv: Zovnishnia torhivlia, 304.

Kostyrko, L. A. & Solomatina, T. V. (2015). Otsinka vplyvu konkurentospromozhnosti na investytsiinu pryvablyvist pidpryiemstv APK [Assessment of the impact of competitiveness and investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises]. Chasopys ekonomichnykh reform, 2, 72–78.

Lahotiuk, V. O. (2014). Analiz isnuiuchykh pidkhodiv do otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti [Analysis of existing approaches to competitiveness assessment]. Naukovyi visnyk Bukovynskoho derzhavnoho finansovo-ekonomichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 27, 185–191.

Nechyporenko, V. V. (2016). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti system APK natsionalnoho ta rehionalnoho rivniv: metodolohichni aspekty [Evaluation of competitiveness of AIC systems of national and regional levels: methodological aspects]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva, 88(2), 182–189.

Saprun, H. H. & Khmelenko, O. V. (2017). Udoskonalennia pidkhodu do analizu konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv v umovakh mizhnarodnoi intehratsii [Improving the approach to analysis of competitiveness of enterprises in conditions of international integration]. Molodyi vchenyi, 10, 1037–1040.

Stasiuk, O. M. & Bevz, I. A. (2012). Intehralna otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti rehioniv Ukrainy [Integral assessment of the competitiveness of Ukrainian regions]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia, 1, 75–86.

Tykholiz, L. S. (2013). Analiz ta otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Analysis and evaluation of the agricultural enterprises competitiveness]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-tekhnichnoho universytetu, 21, 256–260.

Shliaha, O. V. & Bidunova, K. V. (2014). Sutnist ta metody otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [The essence and methods of assessing the enterprise competitiveness]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika, 8(4), 112–121.

Yuhas, E. F. (2016). Metodychno-protsesualni ta sektoralno-upravlinski determinanty analizu konkurentospromozhnosti [Methodical and procedural, managerial and sectoral determinants of competitiveness analysis]. Naukovyi visnyk Mukachivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika, 1, 190–195.

Yatsenko, V. M. & Yatsenko, O. V. (2015). Stratehichnyi analiz, ekonomichna diahnostyka ta otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv [Strategic analysis, economic diagnosis and evaluation of the agrarian enterprises competitiveness]. Visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho universytetu ekonomiky i menedzhmentu. Seriia: Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2, 91–100.

Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, 30. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en.

Article views: 12
PDF Downloads: 12
Published
2019-06-20
How to Cite
Khodakivska, O., Patyka, N., & Gargasas, A. (2019). METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF THE AGRICULTURE COMPETITIVENESS ASSESSING. Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, (2 (84), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.32782/10.21272/mer.2019.84.05
Section
MACROECONOMIC MECHANISMS