GROWTH AND SOCIAL CAPITAL: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP
Abstract
The article provides an empirical test of the hypothesis of the influence of the level of economic development of the country on the level of development of its social capital based on panel data analysis. In this study, the Indices of Social Development elaborated by the International Institute of Social Studies under World Bank support are used as an indicators of social capital development as they best meet the requirements for complexity (include six integrated indicators of Civic Activism, Clubs and Associations, Intergroup Cohesion, Interpersonal Safety and Trust, Gender Equality, Inclusion of Minorities), comprehensiveness of measurement, sustainability. In order to provide an empirical analysis, we built a panel that includes data for 20 countries divided into four groups according to the level of economic development. The first G7 countries (France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom); the second group is the economically developed countries, EU members and Turkey, the third group is the new EU member states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania); to the fourth group – post-Soviet republics (Armenia, Georgia, Russian Federation, Ukraine). The analysis shows that the parameters of economic development of countries cannot be completely excluded from the determinants of social capital. Indicators show that the slowdown in economic growth leads to greater cohesion among people in communities, social control over the efficiency of distribution and use of funds, and enforcement of property rights. The level of tolerance to racial diversity and the likelihood of negative externalities will depend on the change in the rate of economic growth. Also, increasing the well-being of people will have a positive impact on the level of citizens’ personal safety, reducing the level of crime, increasing trust.
References
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 167.
Social Capital. Research and Training. Retrieved from https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com.
Grootaert, C. & Narayan, D. & Jones, V. N. & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire, 1–53.
Indices of Social Development. Retrieved from http://www.indsocdev.org.
Foa, R. & Tanner, J. C. (2012). Methodology of the Indices of Social Development, ISD Working Paper Series 2012-04. International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS). The Hague. Retrieved from http://www.indsocdev.org/faq.html.
Weizel, C. R. Inglehart, et al. (2005). Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: Which aspects of social capital have the greatest ‘civic’ payoff? Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 121–146.
Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15, 225–249.
Putnam Robert, D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Schuster, T. L., Kessler, R. C., Aseltine, R. H. (1990). Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressive mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423–438. doi: 10.1007/BF00938116.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Knack, S. and Keefer, Ph. (1997). ‘Does Social Capital have an Economic Payoff? A Cross- Country Investigation’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
Schultz, T. P. (2002). Why Governments Should Invest More to Educate Girls. World Development, 30(2), 207–225.
Hjerppe, R. (2003). Social Capital and Economic Growth Revisited, VATT Discussion Papers, Helsinki.
